IN RE: DUSTIN PAUL SEGURA (2023)

Presumably Respondent is no less competent now than when he was given the opportunity to become a member of the bar without having to take the bar examination. This is now a disciplinary matter, pure and simple. The allegations made concern misconduct, not competence. Respondent will now be required to pass the bar examination because he did not take advantage of the opportunity presented to him. I join in the result of the majority because Respondent should have been required to take the bar examination in the initial instance.

McCallum, J., concurring with reasons.