Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: NEIL DENNIS WILLIAM MONTGOMERY
Conditional reinstatement granted. See per curiam.
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
NO. 2022-OB-1756
IN RE: NEIL DENNIS WILLIAM MONTGOMERY
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT
PER CURIAM
On August 31, 2018, we suspended petitioner from the practice of law for one year and one day. We also ordered petitioner to provide an accounting and a refund of unearned fees, with legal interest, to two former clients, and assessed petitioner with the costs and expenses of the disciplinary proceeding. In re: Montgomery, 18-0637 (La. 8/31/18), 251 So. 3d 401. Petitioner now seeks reinstatement to the practice of law.
Having considered the recommendation of the hearing committee, as well as the record of these proceedings, we find petitioner has met his burden of proving that he is entitled to be reinstated to the practice of law. Accordingly, we will reinstate petitioner to the practice of law, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall continue to comply with the terms of the monitoring agreement he signed with the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program (“JLAP”) on August 28, 2019.
2. Petitioner shall authorize the Executive Director of JLAP to report any violations of the JLAP agreement to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”).
3. Upon the expiration of the term of petitioner's JLAP agreement, the Executive Director of JLAP shall make a determination concerning the need for petitioner's continued participation in JLAP.
4. In the event that JLAP determines continued monitoring of petitioner is necessary or appropriate, petitioner shall enter into a new JLAP agreement for the time period recommended by JLAP.
5. Petitioner shall keep his child support obligation current, and shall supply a report to the ODC every six months showing the required payments and proof of those payments.
6. Petitioner shall make a good faith effort to resolve his tax issues with the IRS, and shall supply a report to the ODC every six months detailing his efforts in this regard.
7. In the event that petitioner returns to the private practice of law he shall promptly notify the ODC in writing, and shall consent to the appointment of a practice monitor for a period of two years.
DECREE
Upon review of the recommendation of the hearing committee, and considering the record, it is ordered that Neil Dennis William Montgomery, Louisiana Bar Roll number 30204, be immediately reinstated to the practice of law in Louisiana, subject to the conditions set forth herein. Should petitioner fail to comply with the conditions of probation, his conditional right to practice may be terminated immediately, or he may be subjected to other discipline pursuant to the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement, as appropriate. All costs of these proceedings are assessed against petitioner.
Crichton, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.
In 2018, Justice Marcus Clark and I dissented from the majority opinion in In re: Montgomery, 18-0637 (La. 8/31/18), 251 So. 3d 401, finding the sanction imposed to be too lenient. However, at this juncture, I note that petitioner has complied with all of the conditions for reinstatement set forth in Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 24(E). Further, over the course of the past four years, he has successfully completed inpatient treatment and is in full compliance with his JLAP recovery agreement. Subject to the conditions set forth in the majority opinion, irrespective of my previous position in this case, I commend petitioner for his apparent commitment to recovery and agree with the per curiam that the petitioner be reinstated to the practice of law.
Crichton, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 2022-OB-01756
Decided: February 14, 2023
Court: Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)