STATE v. DAIGLE (2022)

Writ application granted. See per curiam.

Writ granted. The court of appeal utilized an overly narrow interpretation of State v. Jackson, 608 So.2d 949, 954 (La. 1992), to find photographs pertaining to defendant's prior arson conviction inadmissible while affirming the trial court's ruling admitting the eyewitness testimony concerning the subject matter of those photographs. We reverse the court of appeal's ruling to the extent it determined those photographs are inadmissible, and we reinstate the trial court's ruling in its entirety.

Griffin, J., concurs in the result.