IN RE: DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR 42ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT APPLYING FOR SUBPOENA PURSUANT TO LA. C.CR.P. ART. 66 (2022)

Stay denied as moot; writ application granted in part. See per curiam.

Granted in part. Considering the unique facts presented in this case and in the exercise of our plenary authority pursuant to La. Const. Art. V, § 5(A), we find the interests of justice warrant the appointment of a judge ad hoc to preside over this matter. The specific appointment will be made in a separate order accompanying this opinion. Because this appointment renders the recusal issues moot, the application is denied in all other respects.

Crichton, J., dissents and would deny the writ.