Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Martin JONES v. NEO FABRICS, INC., et al.
Writ application granted. See per curiam.
Granted. Under the facts presented, we find the district court did not abuse its great discretion in granting relator's motion in limine. See La. Code Evid. art. 403.
Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed, and the judgment of the district court is reinstated. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.
While the experiment in question may not be admitted for its scientific validity, the existence of it is admissible to show notice or knowledge.
Hughes, J., dissents and assigns reasons. Genovese, J., would grant in part for the reasons assigned by Justice Hughes. Griffin, J., dissents for the reasons assigned by Justice Hughes.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 2021-CC-00236
Decided: April 20, 2021
Court: Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)