Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Morgan McCann THIBODEAUX v. Luke Joseph THIBODEAUX
Luke Joseph Thibodeaux, the father of two minor children, seeks review of a July 24, 2025 judgment of the East Baton Rouge Family Court which designates the father as the children's domiciliary parent, but goes on to provide “the minor children shall remain enrolled in school in the Central Community School System so long as [the children's mother] maintains her residence in Central, Louisiana.”
The authority of a domiciliary parent is set forth in La. R.S. 9:335(B)(3), which provides:
(3) The domiciliary parent shall have authority to make all decisions affecting the child unless an implementation order provides otherwise. All major decisions made by the domiciliary parent concerning the child shall be subject to review by the court upon motion of the other parent. It shall be presumed that all major decisions made by the domiciliary parent are in the best interest of the child. [emphasis added]
The July 24, 2025 judgment clearly designates the father as domiciliary parent. Therefore, in the absence of an implementation order to the contrary, the father retains authority for all decisions affecting the minor children, including school choice.
The mother submits the portion of the judgment maintaining the children's enrollment in the Central Community School System constitutes an implementation order. Although there is no specific form requirement for an implementation order, such an order must satisfy certain requirements, including specifying the legal authority and responsibility of the parents. La. R.S. 9:335(A); Hodges v. Hodges, 2015-0585 (La. 11/23/15), 181 So. 3d 700, 710–11.
The July 24, 2025 judgment fails to specify any legal authority or responsibility of the mother with respect to school choice; rather, it unilaterally decrees the children will remain enrolled in the Central Community School System so long as the mother maintains her residence in the district. This portion of the judgment is an improper infringement on the father's authority as domiciliary parent under La. R.S. 9:335(B)(3) and must be reversed.
DECREE
For the reasons assigned, the portion of the July 24, 2025 judgment providing that the children shall maintain enrollment in the Central Community School System is reversed. The judgment is amended to provide that Luke Joseph Thibodeaux, as domiciliary parent, shall have authority to make all decisions affecting the children, including school choice subject to review by the court upon motion by the other parent. If the other parent objects to the domiciliary parent's choice of school, the family court is directed to apply the presumption that the domiciliary parent's choice is in the best interest of the child, and to hear the motion in an expedited manner.
PER CURIAM
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 2025-CJ-00972
Decided: August 06, 2025
Court: Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)