Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The ESTATE OF Ernestine KNOX v. Gregory BANKS
WRIT GRANTED. It is undisputed the incomplete record was attributable to the Defendant, not the Plaintiff, when the Defendant failed to file copies of his Exhibits A-F in the trial court, after these exhibits were admitted into evidence during the bench trial held via Zoom.1 Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 2161 provides in part: “[A]n appeal shall not be dismissed because the trial record is missing, incomplete or in error no matter who is responsible, and the court may remand the case either for retrial or for correction of the record. An appeal shall not be dismissed because of any other irregularity, error or defect unless it is imputable to the appellant.” See Thomas v. Thomas, 16-0570 (La. App. 4 Cir. 3/15/17), 214 So.3d 97 (wherein the exhibits admitted during the trial were not in the record due to circumstances not attributable to the appellant, and the appellate court, citing La. C.C.P. art. 2161, remanded the matter to the trial court for the limited purpose of correcting the record); see also, La. C.C. P. art. 2088 (which allows, after jurisdiction has been divested to the appellate court, the trial court to have limited jurisdiction over certain matters including “correct any misstatement, irregularity, informality, or omission of the trial record, as provided in Article 2132.”). As the incomplete record was not attributable to the Plaintiff, the appellate court erred in affirming the trial court's judgment without a complete record. Accordingly, the appellate court's decision is reversed, and the matter is remanded to the trial court for the limited purpose of Defendant filing Exhibits A-F in the record. Once the record is corrected on remand, the appeal may be re-docketed in the appellate court upon the lodging of the necessary supplemental record.
FOOTNOTES
1. Responding to the court of appeal's order for the Clerk of Court for the Nineteenth Judicial District Court to supplement the record with the exhibits that were introduced at the bench trial by the Defendant, the Clerk of Court responded that this bench trial was held via Zoom and “[w]here the exhibits were offered and introduced during the bench trial, the actual hard copies of the evidence were never turned in to the [Clerk of Court's Office].”
PER CURIAM:
Weimer, C.J., dissents and would deny. Crain, J., concurs.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 2024-C-00516
Decided: October 15, 2024
Court: Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)