Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: SUCCESSION OF BETTY SHADRICK HEDIN
Writ application granted. See per curiam.
03/06/24
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No. 2024-CC-00249
IN RE: SUCCESION OF BETTY RUTH SHADRICK HEDIN
On Supervisory Writ to the Twenty-Second Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany
PER CURIAM
The writ is granted and made peremptory. Because the district court failed to conduct a contradictory hearing, order the taking of an inventory of the property of the succession, or require the posting of security as required by law, the judgment of the district court appointing a provisional administrator is vacated and set aside. See La. Code Civ. P. art. 3112, 3113. The case is remanded to the district court to make a determination, after a contradictory hearing, as to whether the appointment of a provisional administrator is warranted under La. Code Civ. P. art. 3111. See Succession of Smith, 22-565 (La. App. 5 Cir. 5/24/23), 367 So. 3d 800, 805 (the trial court has discretion in determining whether a provisional administrator is necessary to “preserve, safeguard, and operate the property of the succession.”). If the court finds such an appointment is indeed warranted, it shall comply with all other requirements of law, including ordering the posting of security under La. Code Civ. P. art. 3112.
I agree with the Court's ruling vacating the district court's ruling and remanding the matter for a contradictory hearing, pursuant to La. C.C.P. art. 3111, regarding whether the appointment of a provisional administrator is warranted under the circumstances of this case. However, I write separately to highlight that the district court's great discretion will allow it to examine all possible individuals who may serve as provisional administrator, whether it be Raymond E. Hedin (decedent's husband), Mark A Storch (decedent's son), or an independent third party. Given the contentious nature of the facts and circumstances as presently alleged, in my view, a contradictory hearing followed by a reasoned decision is paramount.
Weimer, C.J., additionally concurs for reasons assigned by Crichton, J. Crichton, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 2024-CC-00249
Decided: March 06, 2024
Court: Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)