Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
ROBERT SCHIFF v. LAWRENCE G. PUGH, III, FREDERICK T. HAAS, III, ALEXANDER L. BURNS, AND PUGH ACCARDO HAAS RADECKER & CAREY, L.L.C.
CRICHTON, J., would grant and assigns reasons:
Pursuant to the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure article 966(H), I would grant the defendants’ writ application, order the parties to file written briefs, and allow an opportunity to make a written request for oral argument. It appears the plaintiff's cause of action is based upon a speculative theory of loss causation. Thus, in my view, this matter warrants further review by this Court to determine whether defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 2023-CC-01723
Decided: February 27, 2024
Court: Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)