Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
RONETTA NORRIS v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES OF LOUISIANA, INC., HOPE DOE, AXA INSURANCE COMPANY, AND VILLAGE VENTURES, LLC
Pursuant to the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure article 966(H), I would grant the defendant's writ application, order the parties to file written briefs, and allow an opportunity to make a written request for oral argument. In my view, the Court should review this case consistent with the standards recently articulated in Farrell v. Circle K Stores, Inc., 2022-0849, p.13 (La. 3/17/23), 359 So. 3d 467, 478 (“Summary judgment, based on the absence of liability, may be granted upon a finding that reasonable minds could only agree that the condition was not unreasonably dangerous; therefore, the defendant did not breach the duty owed. In such instance, the plaintiff would be unable to prove the breach element at trial.”).
Crichton, J., would grant and assigns reasons.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 2023-CC-01512
Decided: January 17, 2024
Court: Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)