HOMER FIELDS PATRICIA SMITH APPELLANTS v. FOR KARA LYNN PACE RYLEIGH PACE TESSA PACE NORMA GENE ROWLES MIKE ROWLES JANICE SMITH ORVILLE SMITH CAROLINE BRANDENBURG LARRY BRANDENBURG DOUGLAS PACE ABBY PACE BILLY PACE EDDIE BOONE PACE HEIRS RUBLE HOSKINS DANNY DEAN HOSKINS KENNETH HOSKINS PAT HOSKINS MARGERY ABEL DANIEL ABEL ELAINE FARMER GEWANDINE COLLETT KATHLEEN ROBERTS DONALD ROBERTS UNKNOWN HEIRS DAN PACE DANIEL BOONE PACE PACE BLEDSOE COAL LEASING COMPANY APPELLEES (2011)

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

OPINIONAFFIRMING

Bonnie Fields, Homer Fields, and Patricia Smith (Appellants) appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of Appellees on their claim to an interest in D.B. Pace's property.   Appellants argue that summary judgment was inappropriate because there was sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the mother of Homer and Patricia was the legitimate child of D.B. Pace. We affirm.

Homer Fields and Patricia Smith are the children of Rebecca Pace, whose given name was Robert Bruce Smith.^Double Bonnie Fields is the spouse of Homer Fields.   Appellants claim that Rebecca was the legitimate daughter of D.B. Pace and Fannie Smith.   D.B. Pace died in 1948.   Rebecca died on May 10, 1996, and did not make any claims of heirship to D.B. Pace during her lifetime.   Appellants filed the present action in Leslie Circuit Court seeking a declaration that Rebecca was an heir at law of D.B. Pace and entitlement to a proportional share of his property.   The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Appellees concluding that Appellants could not sustain their burden of proof because there was no evidence to show that Fannie Smith was married to D.B. Pace when Rebecca was born.   This appeal followed.

Appellants argue that summary judgment was inappropriate because there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Rebecca was the legitimate heir of D.B. Pace.

In reviewing a grant of summary judgment, our inquiry focuses on “whether the trial court correctly found that there were no genuine issues as to any material fact and that the moving party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”  Scifres v. Kraft, 916 S.W.2d 779, 781 (Ky.App.1996);  Kentucky Rule(s) of Civil Procedure (CR) 56.03.  “[T]he proper function of summary judgment is to terminate litigation when, as a matter of law, it appears that it would be impossible for the respondent to produce evidence at the trial warranting a judgment in his favor.”  Steelvest v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc., 807 S.W.2d 476, 480 (Ky.1991).

The material issue is whether Rebecca was born in wedlock to D.B. Pace, not merely whether she was his daughter.   See Turner v. Perry County Coal Corp., 242 S.W.3d 658, 660 (Ky.App.2007).   In Turner, this Court held that when a man died intestate prior to April 26, 1977, any children born to him out of wedlock would only inherit from the mother because the decision striking down KRS 391.090(2) ^Double was not applied retroactively.  Id. While Appellants failed to produce a marriage license, parol evidence may be introduced to prove the existence of a valid marriage notwithstanding the absence of record evidence.  Pinkhasov v. Petocz, 331 S.W.3d 285, 293 (Ky.App.2011)(citing Vest's Adm'r v. Vest, 234 Ky. 587, 28 S.W.2d 782, 783 (1930)).   When there is conflicting evidence as to whether a marriage existed, the issue must be resolved on the evidence.  Id. at 294.

However, Appellants produced no evidence that D.B. Pace and Fannie Smith were ever actually married.   As stated above, there was no license.   There was a marriage bond, which by its own terms, only evidenced an intention to marry.   The marriage certificate attached to the bond was left completely blank.   Similarly, the note from Fannie Smith's parents giving her permission to marry does not demonstrate that the marriage actually occurred.   There were no witnesses to the marriage.   Ms. Pruda North testified that D.B. Pace and Fannie Smith stayed together and “they ought to [have] been married,” but not that they actually married.   Appellants also point to a birth certificate for Rebecca, which named D.B. Pace and Fannie Pace as her parents.   However, this purported birth certificate was obtained by Appellants in 2005, nine years after Rebecca's death in 1996.   Furthermore, the certificate provides no evidence that D.B. Pace and Fannie Smith actually complied with the statutory requirements of a valid marriage.   Simply holding themselves out as man and wife does not provide evidence of a valid marriage because Kentucky does not recognize common-law marriage.  Pinkhasov v. Petocz, supra.   Therefore, because no evidence of a valid marriage between D.B. Pace and Fannie Smith was presented, the trial court properly granted summary judgment.

Accordingly, the order of the Leslie Circuit Court is affirmed.

ALL CONCUR.

ISAAC, SENIOR JUDGE: