STATE v. RENTERIO (2022)

Court of Appeals of Kansas.

STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Miguel S. RENTERIO, Appellant.

No. 124,673

Decided: July 22, 2022

Before Green, P.J., Schroeder and Cline, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Miguel S. Renterio appeals the district court's sentencing decision because it did not follow the recommendations in his plea agreement. We granted Renterio's motion for summary disposition under Kansas Supreme Court Rule 7.041A (2022 Kan. S. Ct. R. at 48). The State did not respond.

Under the revised Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act, we lack jurisdiction to review Renterio's sentence because it was within the presumptive range for the crimes charged. K.S.A. 2021 Supp. 21-6820(c)(1); State v. Albano, 313 Kan. 638, 640, 487 P.3d 750 (2021). Also, the district court was not bound by the sentencing recommendations made in the plea agreement. State v. Beck, 307 Kan. 108, 110, 406 P.3d 377 (2017).

Appeal dismissed under Supreme Court Rule 7.041A(d).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network