Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Bobby Ray Rufus MCDONALD, Appellant–Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee–Plaintiff
MEMORANDUM DECISION
[1] After stabbing his nephew in the leg during a night of drinking and smoking spice, Bobby McDonald was convicted of battery with a deadly weapon, a Level 5 felony, and sentenced to the maximum term of six years (to include two years with Tippecanoe County Community Corrections). He asks us to reduce his sentence pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rule 7(B), which authorizes us to revise a sentence if, after due consideration of the trial court's decision, we find that the sentence is “inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense and the character of the offender.” We decline to exercise that authority in this case.
[2] McDonald notes the principle that “the maximum sentence should be reserved for the very worst offender,” Appellant's Br. p. 13, and argues that he does not fall into that class, focusing primarily on his history of mental-health issues (e.g., ADHD, PTSD, and bipolar disorder). While we join the trial court in acknowledging McDonald's mental-health problems, his lengthy criminal record places him comfortably in the worst-offender category. The pre-sentence investigation report—which McDonald does not contest—reveals five felony convictions, twenty-two misdemeanor convictions (including six for battery), a habitual-substance-offender finding, and at least eight probation violations. In addition, while this case was pending, McDonald committed and pled guilty to Class A misdemeanor domestic battery.
[3] The purpose of 7(B) review is to “leaven the outliers.” Cardwell v. State, 895 N.E.2d 1219, 1225 (Ind. 2008). In light of McDonald's criminal history, and his commission of yet another battery while out on bond in this case, the six-year, maximum sentence for Level 5 felony battery is by no means an outlier.
[4] Affirmed.
Vaidik, Chief Judge.
Barnes, J., and Pyle, J. concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Court of Appeals Case No. 79A02–1710–CR–2574
Decided: March 27, 2018
Court: Court of Appeals of Indiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)