Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shane Allen CHEELY, Defendant-Appellant.
Shane Cheely was charged with multiple drug offenses. Cheely pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance as a habitual offender in violation of Iowa Code sections 124.401(5) and 902.8 (2017). The district court accepted the plea. Cheely filed no motion in arrest of judgment. The district court proceeded with sentencing.
On appeal, Cheely claims his plea was not intelligently made because the district court’s plea colloquy did not meet the requirements of State v. Harrington, 893 N.W.2d 36 (Iowa 2017).1 But before we can reach Cheely’s substantive claim, we must consider error preservation. Iowa Rule of Criminal Procedure 2.24(3)(a) provides: “A defendant’s failure to challenge the adequacy of a guilty plea proceeding by motion in arrest of judgment shall preclude the defendant’s right to assert such challenge on appeal.” Cheely admits no motion in arrest of judgment was filed. So it appears error was not preserved.
We are mindful that the sanction of Rule 2.24(3)(a) does not apply unless the district court substantially complied with Rule 2.8(2)(d).2 See State v. Fisher, 877 N.W.2d 676, 680 (Iowa 2016). Cheely appears to admit that the district court substantially complied with Rule 2.8(2)(d). In its responsive brief, the State draws attention to this apparent admission. We accept the parties’ apparent agreement on this point.
On this record, we cannot conclude Cheely preserved error. So we decline to reach the merits.
We affirm Cheely’s conviction.
AFFIRMED.
FOOTNOTES
1. Because we do not reach the merits, we offer no opinion as to whether Harrington alters the guilty plea requirements set forth in Iowa Rule of Criminal Procedure 2.8(2)(b).
2. Iowa Rule of Criminal Procedure 2.8(2)(d) requires the district court “inform the defendant that any challenges to a plea of guilty based on alleged defects in the plea proceedings must be raised in a motion in arrest of judgment and that failure to so raise such challenges shall preclude the right to assert them on appeal.”
MAY, Judge.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 18-0396
Decided: January 09, 2020
Court: Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)