Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Bobby Ray DEVERS, Applicant-Appellant, v. STATE of Iowa, Respondent-Appellee.
Bobby Ray Devers, appeals the district court's summary dismissal of his fourth postconviction-relief (PCR) action. Because he has failed to generate a genuine issue of material fact to warrant a trial on the merits, we affirm.
We review this summary dismissal of the PCR application for errors at law. Moon v. State, 911 N.W.2d 137, 142 (Iowa 2018).
Devers was convicted of sexual abuse with a minor in 2004. We affirmed his conviction on direct appeal. See State v. Devers, No. 04-0478, 2005 WL 724081, at *7 (Iowa Ct. App. Mar. 31, 2005). Three subsequent PCR applications have been dismissed.1 In this fourth PCR application he raised two issues of newly-discovered evidence, which he asserts provide an exception to the three-year statute of limitations under Iowa Code section 822.3 (2017). However, the PCR court, in a detailed discussion of the claims, found neither to be newly discovered. Moreover, the State offered evidence that both claims were belied by the original trial record and exhibits—namely a photographic line-up and testimony as to what the victim was wearing. In addition, Devers admitted at the PCR hearing that he was present at a pre-trial deposition and aware at the time—in 2003—of an apparent inconsistency in descriptions of the victim's clothing.
We agree with the PCR court that neither claim Devers now makes would be newly-discovered evidence. Therefore, the PCR court's grant of summary dismissal is affirmed without further opinion. See Iowa Ct. R. 21.26(1)(b), (d), (e).
AFFIRMED.
FOOTNOTES
1. The dismissal of Devers' first PCR application was affirmed by this court in Devers v. State, No. 08-0592, 2009 WL 1676643, at *5 (Iowa Ct. App. June 17, 2009). The second was dismissed as untimely in 2012 and was dismissed by our supreme court as frivolous in 2013 on direct appeal. The third application was filed in January 2014 and summarily dismissed in March 2014. Similar claims asserted in a federal habeas action were denied in 2011. See Devers v. Fayram, No. C09-139 EJM, 2011 WL 6328389, at *1 (N.D. Iowa Dec. 16, 2011).
VOGEL, Chief Judge.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 18-0121
Decided: January 23, 2019
Court: Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)