Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
CRUZ et al. v. XYTEX CORPORATION et al.
This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court of Georgia. In the original case, Cruz v. Xytex Corporation, (“Cruz I”),1 Jennifer Cruz, C. F. J., J. T. S., M. S., and L. S. (“the Appellants”) appealed from the trial court's order granting a motion to dismiss filed by Xytex Corporation, Xytex Cryo International, J. Todd Spradlin, and Mary Hartley (collectively, “Xytex”) for damages based on sperm procured from Xytex that resulted in children with developmental issues. We affirmed in part and vacated in part.
In Norman v. Xytex Corporation, the Supreme Court of Georgia held that claims which would require recognizing a child's life as an injury could be dismissed because “Georgia law does not recognize claims for damages that depend on life as an injury.”2 However, it also held that “[a]lthough Georgia law does not recognize life as an injury, there can be injuries that predate a child's birth and are not premised on the child's life as an injury.”3
[I]n both pre- and post-conception cases, Georgia law has recognized that a cognizable claim may exist for pre-birth injuries to a child without deeming the child's existence an injury. Any such claims ․ are not wrongful birth claims and should not [be] dismissed on that ground.4
As the Supreme Court further stated, “[t]o the extent that the [Appellants] have pled claims predicated on injuries that are not predicated on life as an injury, these claims are not barred.”5
Therefore, in light of the Supreme Court's ruling, we vacate the trial court's ruling on the Appellants’ motion to dismiss, and remand to the trial court with instruction to determine, consistent with the Supreme Court's decision in Norman,6 whether and to what extent the Appellants have adequately pled claims that do not derive their injury from their children's lives.
Judgment vacated and case remanded with direction.
FOOTNOTES
1. 355 Ga. App. XXV (Case No. A20A0040) (June 24, 2020) (unpublished).
2. 310 Ga. 127, 133 (2) (b), 848 S.E.2d 835 (2020).
3. Id. at 134 (2) (c), 848 S.E.2d 835.
4. Id. at 135 (2) (d), 848 S.E.2d 835 (punctuation omitted).
5. Id. at 138 (2) (e), 848 S.E.2d 835.
6. 310 Ga. 127, 848 S.E.2d 835.
Reese, Judge.
Rickman, C. J., and Miller, P. J., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: A20A0040
Decided: August 30, 2021
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)