Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND HILL et al. v. MAIA.
In City of Richmond Hill v. Maia, 301 Ga. 257 (800 SE2d 573) (2017), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed Division 2 of our opinion in Mayor & City Council of Richmond Hill v. Maia, 336 Ga. App. 555 (784 SE2d 894) (2016), holding that Appellee cannot demonstrate proximate cause and that “Appellants were entitled to summary judgment in their favor.” City of Richmond Hill v. Maia, 301 Ga. at 262 (2). Accordingly, we vacate Division 2 of our opinion and adopt the opinion of our Supreme Court as our own in place of that division.
Judgment reversed.
ELLINGTON, Presiding Judge.
Dillard, C.J., Barnes, P.J., Ray, P.J., McMillian, Reese, and Bethel, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: A15A2334
Decided: September 27, 2017
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)