Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
LEWIS v. The STATE.
Walter Lewis was found guilty by a jury of the offense of possession of a dangerous weapon-a pair of scissors-while he was an inmate in the Twiggs County Jail, in violation of OCGA § 42-4-13(b)(1). We find no error and affirm.
1. Pursuant to jail policy explained to inmates in a jail handbook, Lewis was issued personal hygiene items, which included scissors to be used by inmates to cut their hair. The policy required that inmates use the scissors for that purpose and then return the scissors to a jail officer. In violation of the jail policy, Lewis retained the scissors, took them back to his jail cell, and hid the scissors in his cell, where they were subsequently found by a jail officer.
Under OCGA § 42-4-13(b)(1), “[i]t shall be unlawful for an inmate of a jail to possess any controlled substance, dangerous drug, gun, pistol, or other dangerous weapon․” The scissors did not constitute a dangerous weapon under the statute as long as Lewis lawfully possessed and used the scissors pursuant to the jail policy. The evidence showed, however, that Lewis retained possession of the scissors in violation of the jail policy. Whether at that point the scissors constituted a dangerous weapon under the statute was an issue for the jury. Stone v. State, 236 Ga.App. 365, 366, 511 S.E.2d 915 (1999). Contrary to Lewis's contention, the evidence was sufficient for the jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that he violated OCGA § 42-4-13(b)(1) by having possession of a dangerous weapon while an inmate at the jail. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).
2. Because there was no evidence sufficient to raise the defense of entrapment, there is no merit to Lewis's contention that he was entitled to a jury charge and acquittal on this defense. Robinson v. State, 296 Ga.App. 561, 563-564, 675 S.E.2d 298 (2009).
Judgment affirmed.
ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.
MILLER, C.J., and BARNES, J., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. A09A2297.
Decided: December 17, 2009
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)