Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
SIDHU et al. v. GEORGIA MACON CONTRACTORS & EQUIPMENT, INC.
Because appellants were denied their right to a hearing on their motion for new trial, we vacate the judgment appealed and remand for further proceedings.
Ricky Heath Plumbing Company, Inc. (Heath) sued appellants, P.S. Sidhu and others (referred to collectively as Sidhu), in the Magistrate Court of Bibb County. On motion by Sidhu, Georgia Macon Contractors & Equipment, Inc. (Georgia Macon) was added as a third-party defendant. On further motion by Sidhu, the case was transferred to the Civil Court of Bibb County. There, Sidhu filed a counterclaim against Heath and a cross-claim against Georgia Macon, and Georgia Macon filed a counterclaim against Sidhu.
The jury returned a verdict in favor of Georgia Macon and Heath against Sidhu; judgments were entered awarding $25,000 in damages to Georgia Macon and $23,194.71 in damages to Heath. Sidhu filed a motion for new trial, asserting that during the trial the court had committed legal errors and abused its discretion in various rulings and that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. Although Sidhu requested a hearing on the motion, the trial court denied the motion on the day it was filed without holding a hearing.
Sidhu initially appealed both judgments but later withdrew its appeal against Heath. In its appeal against Georgia Macon, Sidhu has enumerated seven errors. Sidhu first contends that the trial court erred in denying its request for a hearing on the motion for new trial. We agree. In Gantt v. Sweatman,1 this court held that, absent a waiver, a movant for new trial is entitled to a hearing on the motion in the trial court before a ruling is made thereon;2 and that if the movant's right to such a hearing has been denied, we must return the case to the trial court for a hearing and disposition of the motion before the merits of the remaining claims of error are addressed.3 Therefore, we vacate the judgment and remand the case for a hearing on Sidhu's motion for new trial. If the trial court denies the motion, Sidhu may then file another appeal.
Judgment vacated and case remanded.
FOOTNOTES
1. 162 Ga.App. 738, 293 S.E.2d 359 (1982).
2. Id. at 738-739(1), 293 S.E.2d 359.
3. Id. at 739(2), 293 S.E.2d 359.
PHIPPS, Judge.
BLACKBURN, P.J., and ELLINGTON, J., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. A03A1625.
Decided: September 05, 2003
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)