Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
McCONNELL v. The STATE.
Eric McConnell appeals his convictions of armed robbery and aggravated assault. He argues that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict, even though the victim and a bystander identified him as the individual who had accosted and pistol whipped the victim as he was walking down the street, police apprehended him in the vicinity of the crimes shortly after their commission based on the description provided by the victim, and he was found in possession of an item of personal property taken from the victim and of a handgun that could have been used in perpetration of the crimes. McConnell's challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is thus without merit.1
Judgment affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
1. See generally Rankin v. State, 278 Ga. 704, 705, 606 S.E.2d 269 (2004).
PHIPPS, Judge.
JOHNSON, P.J., and MIKELL, J., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. A07A0751.
Decided: April 26, 2007
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)