Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
GATEWAY PINES HAHIRA, LP v. LOWNDES COUNTY BOARD OF TAX ASSESSORS.
This case concerning the ad valorem tax assessment of a rent-restricted apartment complex is before us on remand from the Supreme Court of Georgia. In Gateway Pines Hahira, LP v. Lowndes County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 372 Ga. App. 705, 705, 906 S.E.2d 421 (2024), this Court affirmed the trial court's grant of partial summary judgment to the Lowndes County Board of Tax Assessors. In Division 2 of our opinion, we held that the trial court did not err by finding that “the income approach [to valuation of property] is inapplicable and may not be used based on the current structure of the tax credits which does not provide any actual income to the taxpayer.” Id. at 711 (2), 906 S.E.2d 421 (punctuation omitted).
Our Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider whether “tax assessors [are] permitted to use the income approach to determine the fair market value of a property with low-income housing tax credits.” The Supreme Court answered the certiorari question in the affirmative, reversed the judgment of this Court, and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Gateway Pines Hahira, LP v. Lowndes County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 322 Ga. 442, 448-51 (3), 920 S.E.2d 140 (2025). On remand, we vacate Division 2 of our opinion and adopt the Supreme Court's opinion as our own with respect to that division. Divisions 1 and 3 of our opinion were not affected by the Supreme Court's decision and thus remain in effect. See Shadix v. Carroll County, 274 Ga. 560, 563-64 (1), 554 S.E.2d 465 (2001).
Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part, and case remanded.
Rickman, Presiding Judge.
McFadden, P. J., and Mercier, J., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: A23A1370
Decided: December 03, 2025
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)