Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
HATCHER et al. v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES OF GEORGIA, INC., et al.
In this premises liability case, Susanne and Willie Hatcher appeal from the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Family Dollar Stores of Georgia, Inc. and Garrett's Red and White, Inc. We affirm because the Hatchersfailed to provide this court with a transcript necessary to review the propriety of the trial court's order.
The trial court's order granting summary judgment to the defendants stated that it did so, in part, based upon “evidence having been presented by all parties․” All of the parties acknowledge in their briefs before this court that a hearing was held on the motion for summary judgment, and appellants' notice of appeal stated, “[a] transcript of the evidence will not be filed.” Without this transcript, “we cannot determine whether evidentiary submissions, stipulations, or statements in place by counsel were tendered at the hearing.” Burt Dev. Co. v. Lee County Tax Assessors, 240 Ga.App. 451, 452(1), 523 S.E.2d 81 (1999). Therefore, “we must presume that the trial court's findings are supported by competent evidence and that the court applied the appropriate standard in granting summary judgment.” Id.
We further note that affidavits filed by appellants in the record before us do not include the exhibit mentioned by the affiants, which is a photograph of the location where Mrs. Hatcher and another person fell. This photograph might have been submitted for the trial court's review during the summary judgment hearing, and its absence from the record provides further support for our conclusion that we must affirm the trial court.
Judgment affirmed.
SMITH, Presiding Judge.
RUFFIN, C.J., and PHIPPS, J., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. A06A0009.
Decided: June 16, 2006
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)