Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
WASHINGTON et al. v. SOUTH GEORGIA MEDICAL CENTER.
In Washington v. South Ga. Med. Center, 226 Ga.App. 554, 487 S.E.2d 125 (1997), the Washingtons appealed from the trial court's order dismissing their action against South Georgia Medical Center (the hospital) on the basis that they wilfully failed to appear for their depositions which were noticed to them by the hospital's co-defendant, Swindle. We reversed, concluding that the trial court had no authority to grant the hospital's motion for the sanction of dismissal pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-37(d) because the depositions were noticed, not by the hospital, but by Swindle. Id. In South Ga. Med. Center v. Washington, 269 Ga. 366, 497 S.E.2d 793 (1998), the Supreme Court reversed this Court, held the trial court had authority to grant the hospital's motion for sanctions, and remanded the case to this Court to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing the plaintiffs' claims. Accordingly, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court.
In imposing the sanction of dismissal against the Washingtons pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-37(d) for failure to appear for their depositions, the trial court found that the failure was conscious or intentional. We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court's dismissal of the Washingtons' action against the hospital. Smith v. Mullinax, 122 Ga.App. 833, 178 S.E.2d 909 (1970).
Judgment affirmed.
ANDREWS, Judge.
JOHNSON, C.J., McMURRAY, POPE and BEASLEY, P.JJ., BLACKBURN, SMITH, RUFFIN, ELDRIDGE and BARNES, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. A97A0322.
Decided: February 05, 1999
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)