Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Antonio Michael Major, Appellant, v. Sheriff of Monroe County, Appellee.
Affirmed. See § 447.503(1), Fla. Stat. (2025) (“[A] charge shall contain a clear and concise statement of facts constituting the alleged unfair labor practice, including the names of all individuals involved in the alleged unfair labor practice, specific reference to the provisions of s. 447.501 alleged to have been violated ․ The charge must be accompanied by sworn statements and documentary evidence sufficient to establish a prima facie violation of the applicable unfair labor practice provision. Such supporting evidence is not to be attached to the charge and is to be furnished only to the commission.”); Fla. Admin. Code R. 60CC-5.001(3)(c), (d) (“The charge shall contain ․ [a] clear and concise statement of the facts constituting the alleged unfair labor practice, including the name(s) of the individual(s) involved in the alleged unfair labor practice, the time and place of occurrence of the particular act(s) giving rise to the dispute ․ [and] [t]he specific provision(s) of Section 447.501, Florida Statutes, alleged to have been violated ․”); § 447.503(6)(b), Fla. Stat. (“[A]n unfair labor practice charge is untimely if it is based on events that occurred more than six months prior to the filing date unless the person filing the charge was prevented from doing so by reason of service in the Armed Forces ․”); see also Titus v. Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Dep't Emp., 42 FPER 118 (2015) (“A factually deficient charge cannot be cured by resorting to supporting documents.”) (citing Sarasota CTA v. Sch. Bd. of Sarasota Cnty., 14 FPER ¶ 19010 (G.C. Summary Dismissal 1987)).
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D25-1883
Decided: May 27, 2026
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)