FRANCOIS v. STATE (2026)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Wilson FRANCOIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D25-1526

Decided: May 20, 2026

Before SCALES, C.J., and LOGUE and MILLER, JJ.

Law Offices of Philip R. Horowitz, and Philip R. Horowitz, for appellant. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Jason Michael Ross, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

The standard of review for a lower court's denial of a motion to withdraw a plea is abuse of discretion. See Coley v. State, 350 So. 3d 168, 168 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022). Moreover, “[w]here (as here) [a motion to withdraw a plea] is filed after sentence has been imposed, the defendant bears the burden of establishing that a ‘manifest injustice has occurred.’ ” Toomer v. State, 410 So. 3d 709, 712 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025) (quoting Williams v. State, 919 So. 2d 645, 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)). Nothing in this record indicates the trial court abused its discretion in denying Appellant's motion to withdraw his plea considering the extensive colloquy conducted by the trial court when it accepted the Appellant's plea.

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network