Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Rancifer Lynn BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Rancifer Lynn Brown appeals the resentencing order rendered by the trial court on January 6, 2023, raising essentially two issues, 1) that the trial court failed to award credit for time served as required by Florida law, and 2) that the trial court was without jurisdiction to clarify or modify the sentence imposed on January 6, 2023. The State of Florida filed its answer agreeing that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to amend the appellant's sentence and suggested remanding to the trial court to award credit for time served as required by Florida law.
Having reviewed the record and considered the issues raised on appeal, this court concludes that the trial court erred in failing to award credit for time served as required by Florida law. See State v. Rabedeau, 2 So.3d 191, 193 (Fla. 2009) (“When a criminal defendant is sentenced after being convicted of a crime and serves some portion of that sentence, he or she is entitled to receive credit for the actual service of that sentence, or any portion thereof, in a resentencing for the same crime.”). On the second issue articulated above, we note that the resentencing order of January 6, 2023, did not award credit for time served; however, the transcript of the hearing does reflect the trial court's pronouncement that the appellant receive credit for the time that he has previously served in prison. The State rightfully concedes that the appellant is entitled to credit for time served.
Accordingly, the resentencing order of January 6, 2023, is affirmed and any subsequent order entered by the trial court with the intent to clarify or amend the sentence imposed on January 6, 2023, is quashed as the trial court was without jurisdiction to enter any such orders absent the filing of a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 3.800(b). See Spear v. State, 341 So. 3d 1106, 1110 (Fla. 2022). This cause is remanded to the trial court to correct the sentencing order so that it comports to the oral pronouncement awarding appellant credit for time served.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
FERNANDEZ, C.J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D23-181
Decided: June 23, 2023
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)