Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
GEORGE WOODWARD, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF FLORIDA, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s)
The State of Florida's Response to pro se Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Prohibition and Writ of Habeas Corpus, and pro se Petitioner's Reply thereto, are noted.
Upon consideration, the pro se Petition for Writ of Prohibition and Writ of Habeas Corpus is hereby denied. See Bowens v. Tyson, 578 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 1991); Ford v. Campbell, 697 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
EMAS, LOGUE and BOKOR, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: CASE NO.: 3D23-0513
Decided: May 05, 2023
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)