GRANT v. STATE (2023)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Angellica GRANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D22-834

Decided: May 19, 2023

James R. Jupena, of Law Office of James R. Jupena, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant. Angellica Grant, Quincy, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Following the filing of an Anders ¹ brief by appellate counsel, Appellant, Angellica Grant, appeals pro se her judgment and sentence. We affirm but remand for the correction of a scrivener's error in the judgment. Grant was charged with violating section 827.03(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2019). The judgment indicates that she was convicted under section “827.03(B).” The correct citation should be section 827.03(2)(b).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener's error.

FOOTNOTES

1. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

PER CURIAM.

BOATWRIGHT, KILBANE, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network