Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
YELLOW CAB OF JACKSONVILLE GROUP, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company; Northern Florida Transportation Group, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company; Peninsula Transportation Group, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company; and Jacksonville Transportation Group, LLC, An Administratively Dissolved Florida Limited Liability Company, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Shaun LUTCHMAN, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
While driving his car, Shaun Lutchman was negligently struck by a vehicle, causing him physical injuries and requiring disc replacement surgery. Lutchman sued the Appellants/Cross-Appellees (“the Defendants”) and a jury awarded him $375,000 ($275,000 for past medical expenses and $100,000 for non-economic damages). The trial court entered a final judgment for Lutchman for $289,001.47, after setting off certain amounts.
On appeal, the Defendants claim error in the trial court's refusal to set off the difference between the surgeon's bills for the disc replacement surgery and the amount the surgeon received from the insurance company. This argument is entirely without merit for the reasons set forth in the trial court's order, which we affirm without further comment.
On the cross-appeal, Lutchman argues that the trial court erroneously set off amounts from the jury verdict for which a right of subrogation exists. Under Florida law, there “shall be no reduction for collateral sources for which a subrogation or reimbursement right exists.” § 768.76(1), Fla. Stat. (2023); Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Fla., Inc. v. Matthews, 498 So. 2d 421, 422 (Fla. 1986) (“Florida has long recognized the subrogation rights of an insurer to recover payments made to an insured for injuries which were caused by the tortfeasor.”). At oral argument, counsel for the Defendants agreed with Lutchman and conceded that his cross-appeal was meritorious. As such, reversal is necessary to increase the final judgment by the amount of the erroneous setoffs, which totaled $8,794.47.
REVERSED and REMANDED with instruction to increase the final judgment by the $8,794.47.
PER CURIAM.
LAMBERT, C.J., and MAKAR and SOUD, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Case No. 5D23-85
Decided: May 19, 2023
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)