ROGER MALOCH v. LAURA DAVIS LAURA MALOCH (2023)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

ROGER MALOCH, Appellant, v. LAURA DAVIS F/K/A LAURA MALOCH, Appellee.

Case No. 5D21-2493

Decided: May 12, 2023

William S. Graessle, of William S. Graessle, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant. Rebecca Bowen Creed, of Creed & Gowdy, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.

AFFIRMED.

Former Husband argues, inter alia, that a miscalculation of alimony appears on the face of the judgment. I agree, but I cannot discern if the miscalculation is in the trial court's assessment of Former Wife's need or in the alimony amount itself. Therefore, I would reverse for the trial court to reconsider both calculations. See Poropat v. Poropat, 54 So. 3d 507, 508 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (“[W]e reverse and remand to the trial court to correct the mathematical error which is reflected on the face of the order.” (citation omitted)). I would otherwise affirm.

PER CURIAM.

LAMBERT, C.J., and EDWARDS, J., concur. EISNAUGLE, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part, with opinion.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network