PEDRO FLORES v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (2023)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

PEDRO FLORES, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D23-0412

Decided: March 13, 2023

Upon consideration, the pro se Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is treated as a petition for writ of mandamus, and it is ordered that said petition is hereby dismissed. See LaFerte-Diaz v. Dep't of Corr., 187 So. 3d 908 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (holding that the inmate was first required to utilize the inmate grievance system before filing a petition for writ of mandamus); Dunbar v. State, 225 So. 3d 971, 972 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (“As an inmate in the custody of the [Department of Corrections], Dunbar must fully exhaust his administrative remedies regarding gain time or credit owed within the [Department of Corrections] before he is entitled to pursue judicial remedies.”).

HENDON, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network