Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
F.R. ALEMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant, v. EAC CONSULTING, INC., Appellee.
Appellant F.R. Aleman & Associates, Inc. (“Aleman”) challenges that portion of the trial court's July 22, 2022 order (i) confirming an arbitration panel's award of attorney's fees to appellee EAC Consulting, Inc., and (ii) denying Aleman's motion to vacate that portion of the arbitration award.1 Specifically, Aleman asserts (as it did below) that, while the parties agreed to have the arbitration panel resolve their underlying contractual dispute, they did not authorize the arbitration panel to determine entitlement to, and amount of, attorney's fees. § 682.11(2), Fla. Stat. (2021) (“An arbitrator may award reasonable attorney fees and other reasonable expenses of arbitration if such an award is authorized ․ by the agreement of the parties to the arbitration proceeding.”); § 682.13(1)(d), Fla. Stat. (2021) (“Upon motion of a party to an arbitration proceeding, the court shall vacate an arbitration award if ․ [a]n arbitrator exceeded the arbitrator's powers.”).
“In reviewing the trial court's order, we review findings of fact for competent substantial evidence and questions of law de novo.” Marr v. Webb, 930 So. 2d 734, 737 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). Because the record contains competent, substantial evidence supporting the trial court's determination that the parties expressly agreed to have the arbitration panel adjudicate the attorney's fees issue, we affirm the trial court's confirmation of the arbitration panel's fees award. § 682.11(2), Fla. Stat. (2021).
Affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
1. Aleman also appeals the trial court's award of pre-judgment interest. We affirm that aspect of the challenged July 22, 2022 order without discussion. Because Aleman failed to move below to have the trial court correct an alleged miscalculation of the figures contained in the arbitration award, we decline to address this issue in the first instance. See § 682.14(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2021) (“Upon motion made within 90 days after the movant receives notice of the award pursuant to s. 682.09 or within 90 days after the movant receives notice of a modified or corrected award pursuant to s. 682.10, the court shall modify or correct the award if ․ [t]here is an evident miscalculation of figures or an evident mistake in the description of any person, thing, or property referred to in the award.”).
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D22-1306
Decided: April 05, 2023
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)