Y.R., A Child, Appellant, v. STATE (2023)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Y.R., A Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D22-318

Decided: March 22, 2023

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Logan T. Mohs, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pablo Tapia, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Affirmed. See § 90.704, Fla. Stat. (2021) (“The facts or data upon which an expert bases an opinion or inference may be those perceived by, or made known to, the expert at or before the trial. If the facts or data are of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the subject to support the opinion expressed, the facts or data need not be admissible in evidence. Facts or data that are otherwise inadmissible may not be disclosed to the [factfinder] by the proponent of the opinion or inference unless the court determines that their probative value in assisting the [factfinder] to evaluate the expert's opinion substantially outweighs their prejudicial effect.”).

Per Curiam.

Warner, Gerber and Levine, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network