Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
TAMILYN WHITE, Appellant, v. KEVIN WAYNE MORRIS, Appellee.
Appellant challenges the circuit judge's supplemental final judgment and order on the recommended order ratifying and adopting all the findings and recommendations of the general magistrate. In the final judgment and order, the circuit judge denied Appellant's supplemental petition to modify parental responsibility and denied Appellant's petition for relocation with the parties’ minor children.
Addressing the only issue preserved for appellate review, we find no error in the application of the amendments to rule 12.490, Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure, to the trial court proceedings after April 1, 2022, the effective date of the amendments. See In re Amendments to Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure 12.490 & 12.491, & Forms 12.920(a)-(c), 346 So. 3d 1053, 1055 (Fla. 2022) (adopting amended rule); Smith v. Smith, 902 So. 2d 859, 863 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (recognizing “the settled principle of law that procedural or remedial changes in the law are applicable to pending cases”). The Appellant was informed by the magistrate both verbally in court and in the recommended order of the requirement to file a motion to vacate within ten days if she wished to challenge the recommended order. See Fla. Fam. L. R. P. 12.490(e). The then pro se Appellant did not do so. Nor did she file any exceptions to the magistrate's recommendation as allowed under the superseded rule. See Fla. Fam. L. R. P. 12.490(f) (1995). The supplemental final judgment and order on recommended order is therefore
AFFIRMED.
PER CURIAM.
BILBREY, WINOKUR, and LONG, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 1D22-1597
Decided: March 22, 2023
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)