Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ananias Westbrook, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee.
ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
On January 11, 2023, the Court affirmed the denial of Ananias Westbrook's appeal from a trial court order imposing sanctions and barring appellant from filing any further pro se motions. On the same date, the Court ordered Westbrook to show cause why he should not be prohibited from filing further pro se appeals, petitions, motions, or other pleadings in this Court relating to lower tribunal case F93-14423.
Upon consideration of Westbrook's response to the order to show cause and the successive, duplicative, pro se petitions and appeals brought by Westbrook, we conclude that good cause has not been shown. Westbrook has engaged in the filing of meritless, frivolous, and successive claims, continuing to seek relief from this Court notwithstanding prior adverse determinations on the merits and warnings from this court. See Westbrook v. State, 48 Fla. L. Weekly D130a (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 11, 2023); and Westbrook v. State, 149 So. 3d 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).
In accordance with Jimenez v. State, 196 So. 3d 499 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016), State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999), and Concepcion v. State, 944 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), Westbrook is prohibited from filing any further pro se appeals, pleadings, motions, or petitions relating to his conviction, judgment, and sentence in lower tribunal case F93-14423. We direct the Clerk of the Third District Court of Appeal to refuse to accept any such papers relating to the circuit court case number unless they have been reviewed and signed by an attorney who is a duly licensed member of The Florida Bar in good standing. See Whipple v. State, 112 So. 3d 540 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).
Additionally, any such further and unauthorized pro se filings by Westbrook may subject him to appropriate sanctions, including the issuance of written findings forwarded to the Department of Corrections for its consideration of disciplinary action, including the forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279, Fla. Stat. (2014).
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D22-1419
Decided: March 01, 2023
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)