Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
LEO JOHN GUERIN, JR., Appellant, v. COUNTRYSIDE NORTH COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.
Leo John Guerin, Jr., appeals a final judgment of foreclosure rendered in favor of the Countryside North Community Association, Inc. (Association). We affirm the final judgment in all respects but one. The final judgment awards $265.02 in attorneys' fees to the Association for work of the Association's prior counsel, but the judgment lacks specific findings on prior counsel's reasonable hourly rate and the number of hours prior counsel reasonably expended. These findings are required by Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 1985), and the final judgment is facially erroneous without them. See Harris v. McKinney, 20 So. 3d 400, 403 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (“[T]he absence of the required [Rowe] findings in the written order renders the order fundamentally erroneous on its face ․”); see also R.M.A. v. J.A.S., 269 So. 3d 649, 652 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019) (“Reversal is required unless the trial court makes specific written findings as to [the] Rowe factors.”). We therefore reverse the final judgment in this limited respect and remand with instructions that the trial court make specific findings on prior counsel's fees as Rowe requires. We affirm the remainder of the final judgment without comment.1
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.
FOOTNOTES
1. We note, however, that there appears to be a calculation error in the total attorneys' fees awarded in the final judgment, which the trial court should address on remand. The total award stated in paragraph 1 of the judgment ($2,790.02) differs from the total of the components listed in paragraph 9 of the judgment ($2,734.82).
LABRIT, Judge.
NORTHCUTT and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 2D22-2004
Decided: February 24, 2023
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)