ADAM KEITH HORNE v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2023)

Adam Keith Horne appeals the judgment and sentence entered following his convictions for kidnapping, robbery with a deadly weapon, and grand theft of a motor vehicle. The victim, an elderly woman, encountered Horne and his accomplice as she was entering a store to shop for groceries. The victim offered to help them after learning they needed a ride to their hotel. Horne and his accomplice accepted her assistance, then proceeded to commit the acts that resulted in the criminal convictions we review today.

Our independent Anders ¹ review of the record in this case reveals no arguable issues on appeal. Competent, substantial evidence supports Horne's convictions, and the trial court imposed a legal sentence for each of those convictions.

As for the various issues raised in Horne's pro se brief,² we note that almost all are unpreserved, and none constitute reversible or fundamental error.

AFFIRMED.

FOOTNOTES

1.   Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

2.   In re Anders Briefs, 581 So. 2d 149, 151 (Fla. 1991) (“Upon counsel's submission of the motion to withdraw accompanied by an Anders brief, the indigent must be given the opportunity to file a pro se brief.”).

PER CURIAM.

OSTERHAUS, BILBREY, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.