JONATHAN GOLDBERG v. JACQUELINE BETH GOLDBERG (2023)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

JONATHAN F. GOLDBERG, Appellant, v. JACQUELINE BETH GOLDBERG, Appellee.

No. 4D21-3459

Decided: February 15, 2023

Richard J. Boyle of Yaffa Family Law Group, Boca Raton, for appellant. Michael D. Cirullo, Jr., of Goren, Cherof, Doody & Ezrol, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court's imputation of income to the Husband at $200,000 a year. However, it appears that the trial court erred in using a gross income figure for determining alimony. Ability to pay alimony must be based on a party's net income, rather than gross income, as net income is the measure of funds available to the party. See Whittaker v. Whittaker, 331 So. 3d 719, 721 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021); Conlin v. Conlin, 212 So. 3d 487, 488 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). Where “it is not apparent that the trial court based its alimony calculations on net income,” an appellate court will reverse and remand for the trial court to make the required findings and to modify the award if necessary. Rentel v. Rentel, 124 So. 3d 993, 994 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

We affirm all other issues on appeal and reverse and remand for the trial court to reconsider the alimony award based on the Husband's net income and to take additional evidence, if necessary, on the parties’ current incomes.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network