Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JAMES DEFRAIL BURNS, Petitioner, v. KEN MASCARA, Sheriff St. Lucie County, Florida, Respondent.
We grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus and remand for the trial court to make the factual findings required for continued pretrial detention or to set bond.
Charged with possession of cocaine, petitioner was held without bond after violating the conditions of pretrial release by failing to report for a drug test. Petitioner twice moved to set bond and the trial court denied both motions. At the second hearing, the trial court commented that it did not find petitioner's testimony “to be the least bit credible.” At no time, did the State file a motion for pretrial detention.
A violation of pretrial release conditions alone cannot supply a basis for pretrial detention without a finding that “no conditions of release can reasonably protect the community from risk of physical harm to persons, assure the presence of the accused at trial, or assure the integrity of the judicial process.” Blair v. State, 15 So. 3d 758, 760 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), approved, 39 So. 3d 1190 (Fla. 2010).
In Blair, we explained that “[a] pretrial detention order must contain findings of fact and conclusions of law showing that the constitutional and statutory criteria for pretrial detention are met.” Id. at 759 (citing Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.132(c)(2); § 907.041(4)(i), Fla. Stat. (2008)); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.131(g) & (h).
Here, in its order, the trial court merely found that Burns’ testimony was not credible. The trial court did not make any further findings as required by Blair.
Petition granted.
PER CURIAM.
WARNER, GROSS and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 4D22-3346
Decided: February 08, 2023
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)