ALEJANDRO VIDELA v. HITOMI OGINO (2023)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

ALEJANDRO VIDELA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. HITOMI OGINO, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D22-2228

Decided: January 09, 2023

Following review of the Petition for Writ of Prohibition, it is ordered that said Petition is hereby denied. See Ripley v. Ripley, 278 So. 3d 190, 192 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019) (“The court's adverse ruling against [a former spouse] is not a sufficient basis to warrant disqualification.”); see also Eisenberg v. City of Miami Beach, 714 So. 2d 613, 614 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (citing Barwick v. State, 660 So. 2d 685, 692 (Fla. 1995)) (“A claim that a trial judge has made an error of law is not a basis for disqualification.”).

LOGUE, SCALES and GORDO, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network