Edward F. Heil, Jr., Appellant, v. Fisher Island Community Association, Inc., et al., Appellees. (2023)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Edward F. Heil, Jr., Appellant, v. Fisher Island Community Association, Inc., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D22-581

Decided: January 25, 2023

Before LOGUE, SCALES and HENDON, JJ.

Mark Rutecki & Associates, P.A., and Mark C. Rutecki (Celebration); Rutecki & Associates, P.A. and Heather A. Rutecki, for appellant. Law Offices of Geoffrey B. Marks, and Geoffrey B. Marks, for appellee Oceanside at Fisher Island Condominium Association, Inc.; and PeytonBolin, PL, and Mauri Peyton (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellee Fisher Island Community Association, Inc.

Affirmed. Fla. Dep't of Health v. Florigrown, LLC, 317 So. 3d 1101, 1110 (Fla. 2021) (“To the extent the decision to enter a temporary injunction involves an exercise of discretion, we defer to the trial court unless it has abused its discretion.”); Briceño v. Bryden Invs., Ltd., 973 So. 2d 614, 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (“A trial court has wide discretion to grant or deny a temporary injunction and an appellate court will not interfere with the exercise of such discretion unless the party challenging the grant or denial clearly shows an abuse of that discretion.”) (quoting Perry & Co. v. First Sec. Ins. Underwriters, Inc., 654 So. 2d 671, 671 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network