COTTRELL v. STATE (2022)

In this Anders ^* appeal, taken after a no contest plea, the only reserved issue is whether the trial court's denial of Appellant's motion to suppress was correct. We affirm because the trial court's ruling was based on a credibility determination that was supported by the evidence. See State v. Polak, 598 So. 2d 150, 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Affirmed.

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE.   Anders v. State of Cal., 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Per Curiam.

Makar, Winokur, and Long, JJ., concur.