Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
ALISHA WYNN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DAVID URODE, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).
Pro se Appellant's Response and “Urgent Supplemental Response to Order to Show Cause” are noted. The Memorandum of Law is also noted. Any incorporated motion is hereby denied.
Upon the Court's own motion, it is ordered that the above-styled appeal is hereby dismissed as one taken from a non-final, non-appealable order.
FERNANDEZ, C.J., and GORDO and LOBREE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: CASE NO.: 3D22-1634
Decided: October 13, 2022
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)