Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Brian BRIGGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Pursuant to a plea agreement, Appellant was sentenced to fifteen years in prison, with a ten-year mandatory minimum sentence. Post-sentence, he filed a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(l), seeking to withdraw his plea of nolo contendere. Appellant's motion contended that his plea was involuntary because his attorney failed to inform him that he was eligible for a youthful offender status. The trial court denied the motion without holding an evidentiary hearing, stating in its order that “even if the court had the discretion to impose a Youthful Offender sentence, based upon the egregious facts of this case, the court would impose the same sentence, regardless.”
“[W]hen a motion to withdraw is filed after sentencing, the burden is upon the appellant to show that ‘a manifest injustice has occurred.’ ” Hall v. State, 72 So. 3d 290, 293 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (quoting Snodgrass v. State, 837 So. 2d 507, 508 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)). Appellant failed to satisfy this burden. Appellant has not asserted, either in his motion below or in his appeal, that but for his attorney's misadvice, Appellant would not have pled guilty and would have insisted on going to trial. “This is fatal to his claim.” Alfred v. State, 998 So. 2d 1197, 1200 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). Moreover, in light of the trial court's pronouncement that it would not have reduced Appellant's sentence per the permissive (not mandatory) youthful offender sentencing option, Appellant has not demonstrated prejudice or harmful error. Accordingly, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to withdraw plea.
Affirmed.
Per Curiam.
Conner, C.J., Forst and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 4D21-1585
Decided: February 16, 2022
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)