Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Moise LAMOUR, Appellant, v. MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER OF FLORIDA, INC., et al., Appellees.
Affirmed. See § 766.103(3)(a)-(b), Fla. Stat. (2014) (providing in pertinent part: “No recovery shall be allowed in any court in this state against any physician licensed under chapter 458[ ] ․ in an action brought for treating, examining, or operating on a patient without his or her informed consent when․ the patient would reasonably, under all the surrounding circumstances, have undergone such treatment or procedure had he or she been advised by the physician․ in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (a)); Santa Lucia v. LeVine, 198 So. 3d 803, 811 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (“It is not enough for the plaintiff to testify that he would not have consented had a specific, material disclosure been made; he must present evidence ‘that a reasonably prudent person would not have consented to the procedure had the material risks been disclosed.’ ”) (quoting Ritz v. Fla. Patient's Comp. Fund, 436 So. 2d 987, 993 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)); Salinetro v. Nystrom, 341 So. 2d 1059, 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) (“Liability for negligence depends on a showing that the injury suffered by plaintiff was caused by the alleged wrongful act or omission to act by the defendant. Merely to show a connection between the negligence and the injury is not sufficient to establish liability.”) See also Gooding v. Univ. Hosp. Bldg., Inc., 445 So. 2d 1015, 1018 (Fla. 1984) (“In negligence actions Florida courts follow the more likely than not standard of causation and require proof that the negligence probably caused the plaintiff's injury.”); Howell v. Balchunas, 284 So. 3d 1180, 1183 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (affirming an order dismissing with prejudice a negligence claim, holding: “An injury that ‘could have’ been caused by a medical professional's action or an action falling below the standard of care that ‘potentially’ could have led to an injury does not, in our opinion, provide corroboration of reasonable grounds to believe that the claimed negligence ‘resulted in injury to the claimant.’ ”)
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D21-502
Decided: February 16, 2022
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)