Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Christian Joseph BOULOS, Appellant, v. Veronica RUBIO, f/k/a Veronica Boulos, Appellee.
Christian Joseph Boulos (Former Husband) appeals the trial court's September 25, 2020 order determining both: (i) that his minor children with Veronica Rubio (Former Wife) should continue to attend private school; and (ii) that he is required to pay sixty-three percent of the private school tuition costs. When the couple divorced in 2019, they entered into a Marital Settlement Agreement (MSA) that left open the questions of whether the couple's minor children would continue to attend private school and, if so, the parties’ respective obligations toward the payment of tuition. The MSA specifically provided that if the parties were unable to resolve the private school issues, they would present those issues to the trial court for determination.
After the parties were unable to come to an amicable resolution, on March 6, 2020, Former Wife – who wished for the children to continue their private religious school education – filed a motion seeking the trial court's determination of the private school issues. On August 28, 2020, the trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing on Former Wife's motion and subsequently entered the detailed order that Former Husband challenges in this appeal.
We review the order on appeal under an abuse of discretion standard, Pollow v. Pollow, 712 So. 2d 1235, 1236 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), and we are compelled to affirm if the trial court's factual findings are supported by competent substantial evidence. See Lane v. Lane, 254 So. 3d 570, 574 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).
We conclude that the trial court made appropriate findings consistent with Brennan v. Brennan, 122 So. 3d 923, 926 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (holding that the trial court must find: “(1) the parent has the ability to pay for private school, (2) the expense is in accordance with the family's established standard of living, and (3) attendance is in the child's best interest”). These findings are supported by competent substantial evidence. Accordingly, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in entering the challenged order.
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D21-476
Decided: February 09, 2022
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)