SCHULTE v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (2022)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Christine SCHULTE, Appellant, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Appellee.

No. 4D21-1959

Decided: February 02, 2022

Margery E. Golant of Margery E. Golant, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant. No appearance for appellee.

We reverse an order denying a motion to quash service of process.

The trial court made the factual finding that appellant was not properly served, but ruled that appellant had waived any personal jurisdictional challenge by her participation in the lawsuit. Nothing appellant filed in the lawsuit amounted to a request for affirmative relief. See Modway, Inc. v. OJ Com., LLC, 331 So.3d 723, 725 (Fla. 4th DCA Nov. 24, 2021) (stating that “affirmative relief” is “relief for which a defendant might maintain an action independently of plaintiff's claim and on which he might proceed to recovery, although plaintiff abandoned his cause of action or failed to establish it”) (citation omitted); accord Heineken v. Heineken, 683 So. 2d 194, 197 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The trial court relied on Thane v. Rose Acceptance, Inc., 315 So. 3d 760 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021), but we conclude that Thane is distinguishable. Thane involved a request to reschedule, which acknowledges jurisdiction, unlike appellant's motion in this case.

Reversed.

Per Curiam.

Gross, Ciklin and Levine, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network