EVANS v. STATE (2022)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

James EVANS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D21-1492

Decided: January 05, 2022

Dane K. Chase of Chase Law Florida, P.A., Saint Petersburg, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessica L. Underwood, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Affirmed. See State v. McKenzie, ––– So.3d ––––, ––––, 46 Fla. L. Weekly S271, 2021 WL 4314052, at *6 (Fla. Sept. 23, 2021) (“[A] circuit court has jurisdiction to impose a sexual predator designation on an offender who qualifies under section 775.21, when the sentencing court did not impose the designation at sentencing and the offender's sentence has been completed.”); Cuevas v. State, 31 So. 3d 290, 291–92 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (determining that designation as a sexual predator may be ordered after a defendant has served his sentence and been released); Sheppard v. State, 907 So. 2d 1259, 1260 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (“This court has not declared that it would be a double jeopardy violation for the[ ] employment restrictions [of current section 775.21(10)(b), Florida Statutes] to be prospectively applied.”).

Per Curiam.

May, Gerber and Forst, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network