ROBERTS v. STATE (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Todrick Preanton ROBERTS, etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 3D21-2034

Decided: October 19, 2021

The pro se Petition for Writ of Mandamus is hereby dismissed. See Roberts v. State, 153 So. 3d 961 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (“It is therefore ordered that the Clerk of the Third District Court of Appeal shall refuse to accept any further filings that relate to case number F97-4142, unless they have been reviewed and signed by an attorney who is a licensed member of the Florida Bar in good standing.”). Additionally, and absent a showing of good cause, any such further and unauthorized pro se filings by this Petitioner will subject him to appropriate sanctions, including the issuance of written findings forwarded to the Florida Department of Corrections for its consideration of disciplinary action, including the forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2020).

GORDO, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network