PIMIENTA v. ROSENFELD (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Michelle PIMIENTA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. David Abraham ROSENFELD, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 3D21-0792

Decided: August 25, 2021

Following review of the pro se Petition for Writ of Certiorari and Writ of Prohibition, and the Response thereto, it is ordered that the pro se Petition is hereby denied.

Upon consideration of Respondent's Motion for Appellate Attorney's Fees, it is ordered that said Motion is granted, conditioned upon the trial court's consideration of pro se Petitioner's ability to pay, as required by section 742.045, Florida Statutes.

LOGUE, SCALES and GORDO, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network